Well,
the reason that I e-mailed the past life information is that it did come up in the group and this is a topic that I have had some experience with. Not only with astrology but with the gestalt/hands on deep memory work. I have had nothing but amazing results from this work. I am not quite sure what I deeply think about past llives- sometimes I think we have past lives throught our DNA code. It is like our souls seem to pop into a DNA code that is not only suited to our souls evolutionary desires or just that this is what occured- . I also think that sometimes souls just incarnate in a family to help the families/universal evolution. So I do not know if the Karma or fate of a soul is always personal. I have found that memories really do harbor in the body and doing the deep memory work can help release anything that is blocked in the body itself. If anything I think that the work help us with our imaginations and our compassion. I will write more later.....
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
12 comments:
past lives make me think of rhizome structures. begin and breakaway into something related but with a life of its own. it may be possible to trace the source but it is not essential to exist. still knowing the network makes husbandry (of the psyche/orchid) more possible and more subtile, with a tendancy toward complexity.
I'm glad that you brought up this topic for discussion. It is an unusual topic of conversation and one that has stirred up many questions. My curiousity however is linked primarily with the cell and it's capacity for memory. My thoughts about past life experiences are that they are linked to cell memory, whether they are childhood memories, or memories of a distant ancestor's DNA. I've heard that a large percentage of who we are at birth comes from previous cell data. The evidence of this that some are proposing is gathered through the research that they're doing on organ transplants and how those new cells are affecting the patient that receives the new organs (or blood transfusion). Either way, past life 'therapy' is essential for forward growth, and ultimately does affect how we exit. At least that is how I feel about it. The past life of a cell's history has essential data for how we live our life today.
Have any of you ever felt like you had access to another frame of time or being? (like a past life experience?)
Are any of you a recepient of someone else's blood or body parts?
ps,
interesting what you said about past lives being connected to our dna. something really rings true about that. dna has many functions that we know nothing about. a lot of our dna is what they call junk dna just because they can't find a reason for it, they can't figure out what it's doing. i think the junk dna might truly be connected to past lives...and it also might be some type of sensor?
i've been a big believer in past lives. 30 years ago i remember reading about this guy who got hit in the head and started speaking in a new language, a language he had never spoken or barely heard. thats when i started believing. one of these days, i'd love to do some of the work like you've done, ps. i think that would clear up, free up a lot of confusion.
when i mentioned that junk dna may be a type of sensor i'm thinking that it might sense things like people it's known before, past lives. de j vu
its interesting the idea of junk dna and cellular memory. this past april i did a human discection and what was amazing to me was how much flim and mucus is in our bodies. No one really knows what the film that surrounds and is inside the body actually does "besides lubricate". Since we have such a permeable relationship between the inside and outside. I started thinking literally of film making and films and started to wonder if the film in our bodies in some way carried past life images or carried images? I still enjoy thinking that the film in our bodies is like the images on the screen.... IN regaurds to cellular memory, my experience is that the body carries our wounds-tarumas-loves-pleasures and the notion that of cells carry that info is really right on.,...
all so interesting...
p
that's fascinating about the film that covers the inside of our bodies. it makes all the more sense to me now as to why i'm storing dna in clear, plastic pods. a clear film.
98.5% of dna is non-coding, meaning they don't know what it does. 90something % of our universe is dark matter and dark energry and scientists are not sure what it is, does. i wonder if they're is some sort of relationship between the two?
and dna is a language (Searls, DB, Linguistics of DNA, American Scientist 80:579-591). searls says it exhibits all the characteristics of a language, including grammer. and the simpler the organism the higher its efficiendy of dna use; the more non-coding the dna, the higher the biological complexity.
wow,
so interesing, that the more complex an organism the more non-coded dna.. is that because we are not aware of what that dna does? i love the idea of efficent dna...
so much we do not know about the universe......
xop
curious how if scientists don't know what something does, it's "junk." pure-D arrogance. i know in the 50s they just ripped out parts and tossed them aside even when kids were small because they thought they had no function (ie, tonsils, gall bladder, appendix) and then oops discovered that they did. Dr. C. Northrup says she thinks all organs think, not only the brain. i think phoenix' comment about cellular memory is an interesting one. i have some experiences where i feel really connected to someone instantly upon meeting them; it's a curious experience for me as i have no known biological connection to anyone. it makes me believe in past lives although i have no experience except feeling like i've known people before.
yes, i think when we have de j vu it's our dna sensing what it has known before.
...i can remember being taught in school, must have been around 4-5th grade, that if someone pinched you you wouldn't actually feel it there at the pinch spot, instead the synapes would take the information to the brain and then the brain would interpret that for you; but now they know that you actually do feel at the site of the pinch. and when they teach you this stuff they never say "this is what we THINK happens." they teach it like it is the absolute, positive for sure TRUTH. you'd think by now everyone would realize how whispy all knowlege/information really is.
I recall a conversation with Chris Kraus during one of our writing seminars when I was at Art Center. We were all complaining about Andre Breton speaking for Nadja in the book of the same title. She never spoke and he told us all about their interactions and how she felt and what it all meant. We were irritated by the presumption of writing this way. and Chris' response was "well, why don't we just take that authority for ourselves?" I liked the response in relation to my writing; it allowed me to give myself some authority. Reflecting on it in terms of fancy's point about teachers, scientists, and the rest asserting what is known at the time as being absolute truth, i suppose that they are afraid of losing their slim margin of power/authority and so they never express doubt. People I know who do this are usually afraid. It takes a lot of nerve to admit not being certain about what you believe. I suppose I am speculating about when it works to take on that authority and just assume "Right" and when it doesn't. Fluid like everything else i guess.
Post a Comment